Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 6.966
Filter
1.
Cureus ; 16(3): e55369, 2024 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38562362

ABSTRACT

Various ocular manifestations associated with COVID-19 and vaccines, affecting both the anterior and posterior segments of the eye have been documented in the literature. In this report, we present the case of a 25-year-old male who complained of sudden-onset blurred vision and metamorphopsia in both eyes one day after receiving the second dose of the Sinopharm COVID-19 vaccine. The visual loss was painless, with no reported flashes or floaters. The patient had no significant medical or surgical history, no history of trauma, and no drug intake. Upon ocular examination, the best-corrected visual acuity was 6/60 (Snellen chart) in both eyes. The anterior segments appeared unremarkable, while fundoscopy revealed multiple yellowish-white subretinal lesions at the posterior pole of both eyes. Spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) confirmed the presence of subretinal fluid (SRF) with neurosensory detachment in each eye, along with bacillary layer detachment (BALAD). There were no signs of inflammation in the vitreous cavity. A diagnosis of acute posterior multifocal plaque pigment epitheliopathy (APMPPE) was established. The patient was prescribed nepafenac 0.1% drops to be instilled three times a day in both eyes and was advised to return for a follow-up examination in two weeks. At the follow-up visit, the patient's vision had improved to 6/9 in the right eye and 6/6 in the left eye, with most of the SRF absorbed. Unilateral APMPPE with BALAD has been mentioned in the literature following various COVID-19 vaccinations, but, to the best of our knowledge, this is the first case report where bilateral APMPPE with BALAD is reported. This case emphasizes the importance of a thorough eye examination for individuals experiencing ocular symptoms after receiving the COVID-19 vaccine.

2.
J Mol Med (Berl) ; 2024 Apr 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38568327

ABSTRACT

We conducted a comprehensive metabolomic analysis of plasma samples obtained from pregnant women who displayed varying post-vaccination antibody titers after receiving mRNA-1273-SARS-CoV-2 vaccines. The study involved 62 pregnant women, all of whom had been vaccinated after reaching 24 weeks of gestation. To quantify post-vaccination plasma antibody titers, we employed binding antibody units (BAU) in accordance with the World Health Organization International Standard. Subsequently, we classified the study participants into three distinct BAU/mL categories: those with high titers (above 2000), medium titers (ranging from 1000 to 2000), and low titers (below 1000). Plasma metabolomic profiling was conducted using 1H nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy, and the obtained data were correlated with the categorized antibody titers. Notably, in pregnant women exhibiting elevated anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody titers, reduced plasma concentrations of acetate and urea were observed. A significant negative correlation between these compounds and antibody titers was also evident. An analysis of metabolomics pathways revealed significant inverse associations between antibody titers and four distinct amino acid metabolic pathways: (1) biosynthesis of phenylalanine, tyrosine, and tryptophan; (2) biosynthesis of valine, leucine, and isoleucine; (3) phenylalanine metabolism; and (4) degradation of valine, leucine, and isoleucine. Additionally, an association between the synthesis and degradation pathways of ketone bodies was evident. In conclusion, we identified different metabolic pathways that underlie the diverse humoral responses triggered by COVID-19 mRNA vaccines during pregnancy. Our data hold significant implications for refining COVID-19 vaccination approaches in expectant mothers. KEY MESSAGES : Anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody titers decline as the number of days since COVID-19 vaccination increases. Anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody titers are inversely associated with acetate, a microbial-derived metabolite, and urea. Amino acid metabolism is significantly associated with SARS-CoV-2 antibody titers.

3.
Prog Rehabil Med ; 9: 20240012, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38572470

ABSTRACT

Objectives: This study examined the long-term health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and physical function of coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) survivors diagnosed with intensive care unit-acquired weakness (ICU-AW). The correlation between muscle weakness at ICU discharge and HRQOL was assessed. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on COVID-19 patients admitted to the ICU at Hyogo Medical University Hospital between January 2021 and November 2021. The HRQOL was evaluated using the SF-36 questionnaire, and physical function, including muscle strength assessed by the Medical Research Council Sum Score (MRC-SS), grip strength, and the 6-min walk distance (6MWD), were assessed 18 months after the onset. ICU-AW was diagnosed in patients with an MRC-SS of less than 48 at ICU discharge. We investigated the correlations between the MRC-SS at ICU discharge and the long-term clinical outcomes. Results: We included 26 patients, with 13 having ICU-AW. In the long-term follow-up, the ICU-AW group had significantly lower scores than the no ICU-AW group in the SF-36 subscales such as Physical Functioning (PF), Role Limitation-Physical (RP), Bodily Pain (BP), Vitality (VT), Social Functioning (SF), and Role Limitation-Emotional (RE), as well as in the Physical Component Summary Score (PCS). The muscle strength was also decreased in the ICU-AW group. The MRC-SS at ICU discharge was positively correlated with PF, RP, BP, SF, RE, and PCS in SF-36 at the 18-month follow-up. Conclusions: COVID-19 survivors with ICU-AW experienced a long-term decline in HRQOL, and muscle weakness at ICU discharge was correlated with the long-term HRQOL.

4.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis ; 109(2): 116287, 2024 Mar 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38574444

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The study aimed to construct a standardized quality control management procedure (QCMP) and access its accuracy in the quality control of COVID-19 reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). METHODS: Considering the initial RT-PCR results without applying QCMP as the gold standard, a large-scale diagnostic accuracy study including 4,385,925 participants at three COVID-19 RT-PCR testing sites in China, Foshan (as a pilot test), Guangzhou and Shenyang (as validation sites), was conducted from May 21, 2021, to December 15, 2022. RESULTS: In the pilot test, the RT-PCR with QCMP had a high accuracy of 99.18% with 100% specificity, 100% positive predictive value (PPV), and 99.17% negative predictive value (NPV). The rate of retesting was reduced from 1.98% to 1.16%. Its accuracy was then consistently validated in Guangzhou and Shenyang. CONCLUSIONS: The RT-PCR with QCMP showed excellent accuracy in identifying true negative COVID-19 and relieved the labor and time spent on retesting.

5.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38594792

ABSTRACT

Abstract: This is the eighty-third epidemiological report for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), reported in Australia as at 23:59 Australian Eastern Daylight Time [AEST] 14 January 2024. It includes data on COVID-19 cases diagnosed in Australia.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , SARS-CoV-2 , Australia/epidemiology
6.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38594797

ABSTRACT

Abstract: This is the eighty-first epidemiological report for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), reported in Australia as at 23:59 Australian Eastern Daylight Time [AEST] 19 November 2023. It includes data on COVID-19 cases diagnosed in Australia.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , SARS-CoV-2 , Australia/epidemiology
7.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38594798

ABSTRACT

Abstract: This is the eighty-second epidemiological report for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), reported in Australia as at 23:59 Australian Eastern Daylight Time [AEST] 17 December 2023. It includes data on COVID-19 cases diagnosed in Australia.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , SARS-CoV-2 , Australia/epidemiology
8.
Rand Health Q ; 11(2): 4, 2024 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38601714

ABSTRACT

RAND Europe was commissioned by the Novo Nordisk Foundation to conduct a study on pathogen surveillance and current initiatives. The study aims to provide an overview of the pathogen surveillance space internationally and the stakeholders involved, as well as to understand the strengths and weaknesses of different initiatives, the challenges of pathogen surveillance and how they have been addressed, and how data has been used to inform public health decision making. To do this, a scoping review of pathogen surveillance initiatives was conducted, and ten case studies were developed and selected for further review following a workshop attended by the Novo Nordisk Foundation and RAND Europe study team. Interviews were conducted with individuals involved in pathogen surveillance initiatives to gather additional information to develop case studies, and expert interviews addressed gaps in the pathogen surveillance space and models that would be helpful in filling these gaps.

9.
Epidemics ; 47: 100745, 2024 Feb 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38593727

ABSTRACT

We analyse infectious disease case surveillance data to estimate COVID-19 spread and gain an understanding of the impact of introducing vaccines to counter the disease in Switzerland. The data used in this work is extensive and detailed and includes information on weekly number of cases and vaccination rates by age and region. Our approach takes into account waning immunity. The statistical analysis allows us to determine the effects of choosing alternative vaccination strategies. Our results indicate greater uptake of vaccine would have led to fewer cases with a particularly large effect on undervaccinated regions. An alternative distribution scheme not targeting specific age groups also leads to fewer cases overall but could lead to more cases among the elderly (a potentially vulnerable population) during the early stage of prophylaxis rollout.

10.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 8009, 2024 04 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38580716

ABSTRACT

Understanding the factors that influence people's decisions regarding vaccination is essential to promote vaccination. We aimed to clarify the motivations for receiving booster vaccines. We conducted a paper-based questionnaire distributed during January-February 2022 involving students and faculty staff who received the first COVID-19 vaccination at the mass vaccination program during June-September 2021 at Keio University. A total of 1725 participants were enrolled, and all completed the survey. Among these, 64.9% reported a significant adverse event (AEs) affecting daily life after the second vaccine. "Fear of severe COVID-19 illness" (72.6%) was the most common reason for getting vaccinated, followed by "concern of infecting others" (68.4%) and "fear of COVID-19 infection itself" (68.3%). Television emerged as the most influential source of information (80%), followed by university information (50.2%) and social networking sites (42.8%). Multivariate analysis revealed "fear of severe COVID-19 illness", "fear of COVID-19 infection itself", and "trust in the efficacy and safety of the vaccines in general" were significantly correlated with willingness to receive paid vaccinations. The severity of AEs and source of information were not related to participants' willingness to receive booster vaccinations. Participants with positive reasons for vaccination were more likely to accept a third dose.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , Humans , COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects , COVID-19/prevention & control , Motivation , Cross-Sectional Studies , Japan/epidemiology , Universities , Mass Vaccination , Students , Vaccination
11.
Front Immunol ; 15: 1353012, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38571960

ABSTRACT

Background: Type I interferon (IFN-I) and IFN autoantibodies play a crucial role in controlling SARS-CoV-2 infection. The levels of these mediators have only rarely been studied in the alveolar compartment in patients with COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome (CARDS) but have not been compared across different ARDS etiologies, and the potential effect of dexamethasone (DXM) on these mediators is not known. Methods: We assessed the integrity of the alveolo-capillary membrane, interleukins, type I, II, and III IFNs, and IFN autoantibodies by studying the epithelial lining fluid (ELF) volumes, alveolar concentration of protein, and ELF-corrected concentrations of cytokines in two patient subgroups and controls. Results: A total of 16 patients with CARDS (four without and 12 with DXM treatment), eight with non-CARDS, and 15 healthy controls were included. The highest ELF volumes and protein levels were observed in CARDS. Systemic and ELF-corrected alveolar concentrations of interleukin (IL)-6 appeared to be particularly low in patients with CARDS receiving DXM, whereas alveolar levels of IL-8 were high regardless of DXM treatment. Alveolar levels of IFNs were similar between CARDS and non-CARDS patients, and IFNα and IFNω autoantibody levels were higher in patients with CARDS and non-CARDS than in healthy controls. Conclusions: Patients with CARDS exhibited greater alveolo-capillary barrier disruption with compartmentalization of IL-8, regardless of DXM treatment, whereas systemic and alveolar levels of IL-6 were lower in the DXM-treated subgroup. IFN-I autoantibodies were higher in the BALF of CARDS patients, independent of DXM, whereas IFN autoantibodies in plasma were similar to those in controls.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Interferon Type I , Respiratory Distress Syndrome , Humans , Cytokines , COVID-19/complications , Interleukin-8 , Autoantibodies , SARS-CoV-2 , Interleukin-6 , Respiratory Distress Syndrome/etiology
12.
Eur J Med Res ; 29(1): 243, 2024 Apr 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38643153

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Despite vaccines' effectiveness in reducing COVID-19 infection rates and disease severity, their impact on critical patients presenting with acute respiratory failure is elusive. The aim of this study was to further investigate the influence of vaccination on mortality rates among severely ill COVID-19 patients experiencing acute respiratory failure. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study was carried out at a tertiary medical center in Taiwan. From April to September 2022, patients who tested positive for the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) through reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and subsequently experienced acute respiratory failure were included in the study. Baseline characteristics, including vaccination history, along with information regarding critical illness and clinical outcomes, were gathered and compared between patients who received the vaccine and those who did not. RESULTS: A total of 215 patients with COVID-19 exhibiting acute respiratory failure, as confirmed via RT‒PCR, were included in the analysis. Of this cohort, sixty-six (30.7%) patients died within 28 days. Neither administration of the vaccine nor achievement of primary series vaccination status had a significantly different effect on 28 day mortality, number of viral shedding events, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) incidence or other clinical outcomes. Patients who received the booster vaccine and completed the primary series showed a tendency of increased 28 days of ventilator-free status, though this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.815). CONCLUSIONS: Vaccination status did not significantly influence mortality rates, the occurrence of ARDS, or the viral shedding duration in COVID-19 patients with acute respiratory failure.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Respiratory Distress Syndrome , Respiratory Insufficiency , Vaccines , Humans , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19/complications , Respiratory Distress Syndrome/etiology , Respiratory Insufficiency/etiology , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2 , Treatment Outcome , Vaccination
13.
J Infect Chemother ; 2024 Apr 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38588796

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic posed substantial challenges to healthcare systems. Understanding the responses of pediatric health services is crucial for future pandemic planning and preparedness, yet such data remains limited. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, we analyzed data from administrative databases developed by Japan Medical Data Center and DeSC Healthcare Inc. The dataset comprised records of 2,612,511 children, totaling 60,224,888 person-months, from January 2020 to May 2022. Multivariate generalized estimation equations were used to examine the incidence rates of COVID-19 and associated health resource use. RESULTS: Our analysis revealed that the incidence rates of COVID-19 gradually increased from Wave I (2.2 cases per 100,000 person-months) to Wave V (177.8cases per 100,000 person-months), with a notable elevation during Wave VI (2367.7 cases per 100,000 person-months). While nucleic acid amplification tests were primarily used during Waves I-V, the use of rapid antigen tests markedly increased in Wave VI. The hospitalization rates increased gradually from 0.2 in Wave I to 10.2 events per 100,000 person-months in Wave VI, and the case-hospitalization risk decreased from 14.9% in Wave II to 0.7% in Wave VI. Additionally, we observed decreasing trends in the use of antibiotics (Wave I, 31.8%; Wave VI, 9.0%), whereas antipyretic use rose from Wave I (56.1%) to Wave VI (86.6%). CONCLUSIONS: Our study highlighted essential changes in the nationwide pediatric healthcare system's response to the COVID-19 pandemic. These findings provide valuable insights into the future pandemic planning and preparedness.

14.
Vaccine ; 42(12): 3122-3133, 2024 Apr 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38604909

ABSTRACT

IMPORTANCE: Healthcare personnel (HCP) are important messengers for promoting vaccines, for both adults and children. Our investigation describes perceptions of fully vaccinated HCP about COVID-19 vaccine for themselves and primary series for their children. OBJECTIVE: To determine associations between sociodemographic, employment characteristics and perceptions of COVID-19 vaccines among HCP overall and the subset of HCP with children, who were all mandated to receive a COVID-19 vaccine, in a large US metropolitan region. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey of fully vaccinated HCP from a large integrated health system. SETTING: Participants were electronically enrolled within a multi-site NYS healthcare system from December 21, 2021, to January 21, 2022. PARTICIPANTS: Of 78,000 employees, approximately one-third accessed promotional emails; 6,537 employees started surveys and 4165 completed them. Immunocompromised HCP (self-reported) were excluded. EXPOSURE(S) (FOR OBSERVATIONAL STUDIES): We conducted a survey with measures including demographic variables, employment history, booster status, child vaccination status; vaccine recommendation, confidence, and knowledge. MAIN OUTCOME(S) AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy for all dose types - primary series or booster doses - among HCP. RESULTS: Findings from 4,165 completed surveys indicated that almost 17.2 % of all HCP, including administrative and clinical staff, were hesitant or unsure about receiving a COVID-19 vaccine booster, despite the NYS recommendation to do so. Depending on age group, between 20 % and 40 % of HCP were hesitant about having their children vaccinated for COVID-19, regardless of clinical versus non-clinical duties. In multivariable regression analyses, lack of booster dose, unvaccinated children, females, income less than $50,000, and residence in Manhattan remained significantly associated with vaccine hesitancy. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Despite mandated COVID-19 vaccination, a substantial proportion of HCP remained vaccine hesitant towards adult booster doses and pediatric COVID-19 vaccination. While provider recommendation has been the mainstay of combatting COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy, a gap exists between HCP-despite clinical or administrative status-and the ability to communicate the need for vaccination in a healthcare setting. While previous studies describe the HCP vaccine mandate as a positive force to overcome vaccine hesitancy, we have found that despite a mandate, there is still substantial COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy, misinformation, and reluctance to vaccinate children.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , Immunization, Secondary , Adult , Female , Humans , Child , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , Cross-Sectional Studies , Electronic Mail , Health Personnel , Vaccination
15.
Cureus ; 16(3): e55432, 2024 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38567218

ABSTRACT

Background The current study aimed to examine the association between baseline clinical and echocardiographic parameters with new-onset coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection. Methodology We retrospectively enrolled consecutive hospitalized patients from our center during the national outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic in China. Overall, 100 patients were enrolled, including 38 patients with COVID-19 infection. Results Compared with those without infection, patients with COVID-19 infection were more likely male (63.2% vs. 35.5%, p = 0.008), were older (59.08 vs. 52.35 years, p = 0.022), had higher heart failure (31.6% vs. 11.3%, p = 0.018) and hypertension (52.6% vs. 30.6%, p = 0.036) rates, had lower left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (61.16% vs. 65.76%, p = 0.018), had higher A-wave velocity (86.84 vs. 73.63 cm/s, p = 0.003), and had and lower E/A ratio (0.85 vs 1.04, p = 0.015). On univariate and multivariate analysis, baseline echocardiographic parameters (LVEF and A-wave velocity) were independent risk factors for COVID-19 infection. There were no significant changes in echocardiographic parameters during the one-month follow-up period in patients infected and not infected with COVID-19. Conclusions In conclusion, baseline echocardiographic parameters were significantly associated with acute COVID-19 infection.

16.
BMC Urol ; 24(1): 87, 2024 Apr 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38627797

ABSTRACT

JC polyomavirus (JCPyV) is a human polyomavirus that can establish lifelong persistent infection in the majority of adults. It is typically asymptomatic in immunocompetent individuals. However, there is a risk of developing progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) in immunocompromised or immunosuppressed patients. Though JCPyV commonly resides in the kidney-urinary tract, its involvement in urinary system diseases is extremely rare. Here, we reported a case of a 60-year-old male patient with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection who developed hemorrhagic cystitis after receiving treatment with nirmatrelvir 300 mg/ritonavir 100 mg quaque die (QD). Subsequent metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) confirmed the infection to be caused by JCPyV type 2. Then, human immunoglobulin (PH4) for intravenous injection at a dose of 25 g QD was administered to the patient. Three days later, the hematuria resolved. This case illustrates that in the setting of compromised host immune function, JCPyV is not limited to causing central nervous system diseases but can also exhibit pathogenicity in the urinary system. Moreover, mNGS technology facilitates rapid diagnosis of infectious etiology by clinical practitioners, contributing to precise treatment for patients.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , 60507 , JC Virus , Leukoencephalopathy, Progressive Multifocal , Polyomavirus Infections , Male , Adult , Humans , Middle Aged , COVID-19/complications , Polyomavirus Infections/complications , Polyomavirus Infections/diagnosis , JC Virus/physiology
17.
Clin Chem Lab Med ; 2024 Apr 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38641917

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To survey the World Wide Web for critical limits/critical values, assess changes in quantitative low/high thresholds since 1990-93, streamline urgent notification practices, and promote global accessibility. METHODS: We identified Web-posted lists of critical limits/values at university hospitals. We compared 2023 to 1990-93 archived notification thresholds. RESULTS: We found critical notification lists for 26 university hospitals. Laboratory disciplines ranged widely (1-10). The median number of tests was 62 (range 21-116); several posted policies. The breadth of listings increased. Statistically significant differences in 2023 vs. 1990 critical limits were observed for blood gas (pO2, pCO2), chemistry (glucose, calcium, magnesium), and hematology (hemoglobin, platelets, PTT, WBC) tests, and for newborn glucose, potassium, pO2, and hematocrit. Twenty hospitals listed ionized calcium critical limits, which have not changed. Fourteen listed troponin (6), troponin I (3), hs-TnI (3), or troponin T (2). Qualitative critical values expanded across disciplines, encompassing anatomic/surgical pathology. Bioterrorism agents were listed frequently, as were contagious pathogens, although only three hospitals listed COVID-19. Only one notification list detailed point-of-care tests. Two children's hospital lists were Web-accessible. CONCLUSIONS: Urgent notifications should focus on life-threatening conditions. We recommend that hospital staff evaluate changes over the past three decades for clinical impact. Notification lists expanded, especially qualitative tests, suggesting that automation might improve efficiency. Sharing notification lists and policies on the Web will improve accessibility. If not dependent on the limited scope of secondary sources, artificial intelligence could enhance knowledge of urgent notification and critical care practices in the 21st Century.

18.
Cureus ; 16(3): e56546, 2024 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38646211

ABSTRACT

Background Rates of COVID-19 hospitalization are an important measure of the health system burden of severe COVID-19 disease and have been closely followed throughout the pandemic. The highly transmittable, but often less severe, Omicron COVID-19 variant has led to an increase in hospitalizations with incidental COVID-19 diagnoses where COVID-19 is not the primary reason for admission. There is a strong public health need for a measure that is implementable at low cost with standard electronic health record (EHR) datasets that can separate these incidental hospitalizations from non-incidental hospitalizations where COVID-19 is the primary cause or an important contributor. Two crude metrics are in common use. The first uses in-hospital administration of dexamethasone as a marker of non-incidental COVID-19 hospitalizations. The second, used by the United States (US) CDC, relies on a limited set of COVID-19-related diagnoses (i.e., respiratory failure, pneumonia). Both measures likely undercount non-incidental COVID-19 hospitalizations. We therefore developed an improved EHR-based measure that is better able to capture the full range of COVID-19 hospitalizations. Methods We conducted a retrospective study of ED visit data from a national emergency medicine group from April 2020 to August 2023. We assessed the CDC approach, the dexamethasone-based measure, and alternative approaches that rely on co-diagnoses likely to be related to COVID-19, to determine the proportion of non-incidental COVID-19 hospitalizations. Results Of the 153,325 patients diagnosed with COVID-19 at 112 general EDs in 17 US states, and admitted or transferred, our preferred measure classified 108,243 (70.6%) as non-incidental, compared to 71,066 (46.3%) using the dexamethasone measure and 77,399 (50.5%) using the CDC measure. Conclusions Identifying non-incidental COVID-19 hospitalizations using ED administration of dexamethasone or the CDC measure provides substantially lower estimates than our preferred measure.

19.
J Clin Med ; 13(5)2024 Feb 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38592150

ABSTRACT

(1) Background: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has proven challenging to the management of patients with cancer, particularly those receiving systemic therapy. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of COVID-19 on patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with atezolizumab/bevacizumab. (2) Methods: Patients with unresectable HCC who started atezolizumab/bevacizumab treatment between June 2020 and December 2021 at a tertiary cancer center in Korea were included (n = 241) and classified according to their COVID-19 status and severity. (3) Results: Thirty-five (14.5%) patients with unresectable HCC were diagnosed with COVID-19 during atezolizumab/bevacizumab treatment; 26 (74.2%) and nine (25.7%) in the low- and high-severity groups, respectively. The high-severity group showed higher neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratios and lactate dehydrogenase levels. Liver and kidney injuries were observed in 31.4% and 17.1% of total patients, respectively. Liver injury was more prominent in patients with pre-existing liver dysfunction at baseline, who were more prevalent in the high-severity group. Atezolizumab/bevacizumab treatment was delayed by a median of 0 (range, 0-21) day in the low-severity group and 12 (range, 0-35) days in the high-severity group. The high-severity group showed worse post-infection progression-free survival (1.1 vs. 4.8 months, p = 0.017) and overall survival (2.2 months vs. not reached, p = 0.004). (4) Conclusions: Patients with impaired liver function at baseline are more susceptible to high-severity COVID-19, which affects atezolizumab/bevacizumab treatment outcomes.

20.
J Water Health ; 22(3): 601-611, 2024 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38557574

ABSTRACT

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is an infectious viral disease caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) that emerged at the end of 2019. SARS-CoV-2 can be transmitted through droplets, aerosols, and fomites. Disinfectants such as alcohol, quaternary ammonium salts, and chlorine-releasing agents, including hypochlorous acid, are used to prevent the spread of SARS-CoV-2 infection. In the present study, we investigated the efficacy of ionless hypochlorous acid water (HOCl) in suspension and by spraying to inactivate SARS-CoV-2. The virucidal efficacy of HOCl solution in tests against SARS-CoV-2 was evaluated as 50% tissue culture infectious dose. Although the presence of organic compounds influenced the virucidal efficacy, HOCl treatment for 20 s was significantly effective to inactivate Wuhan and Delta strains in the suspension test. HOCl atomization for several hours significantly reduced the SARS-CoV-2 attached to plastic plates. These results indicate that HOCl solution with elimination containing NaCl and other ions may have high virucidal efficacy against SARS-CoV-2. This study provides important information about the virucidal efficacy and use of HOCl solution.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Disinfectants , Humans , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19/prevention & control , Hypochlorous Acid/pharmacology , Water , Disinfectants/pharmacology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...